Comments on: Trac integrated with Subversion – now installable on any OS in 30sec http://www.scrollinondubs.com/2007/06/05/trac-subversion-jumpbox-released/ Sean Tierney's Blog Wed, 01 Feb 2012 18:58:31 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.5 By: john http://www.scrollinondubs.com/2007/06/05/trac-subversion-jumpbox-released/comment-page-1/#comment-65199 john Sat, 07 Jul 2007 02:12:52 +0000 http://67.106.82.230/2007/06/05/trac-subversion-jumpbox-released/#comment-65199 Does the trac on jumpbox use mysql, sqlite or postgresql? Does the trac on jumpbox use mysql, sqlite or postgresql?

]]> By: sean http://www.scrollinondubs.com/2007/06/05/trac-subversion-jumpbox-released/comment-page-1/#comment-55489 sean Wed, 06 Jun 2007 16:05:18 +0000 http://67.106.82.230/2007/06/05/trac-subversion-jumpbox-released/#comment-55489 Kev, main differences: -they have cruise control built in if you need that, ours does not have it -theirs is 387MB - ours is 117MB -I believe theirs is out of date with the latest revision -we have automated backups and a web gui for configuring things like static IP, proxy, etc -we support ours as a product while I believe theirs is more a community thing bottomline- this is a product for us and our main business focus so you know we will be supporting it. There are other VM images of trac like this one -> http://www.vmware.com/vmtn/appliances/directory/308 BuildX is one of the better built ones, but the bottomline is it's not a JumpBox. We also have 9 applications now that use the consistent JumpBox interface so if you've installed one, you know how to work with any of the others. the "any OS" aspect is by virtue of the fact that it runs under virtualization so theirs shares that same quality. But yes, we believe our usability is superior. sean Kev,
main differences:
-they have cruise control built in if you need that, ours does not have it
-theirs is 387MB – ours is 117MB
-I believe theirs is out of date with the latest revision
-we have automated backups and a web gui for configuring things like static IP, proxy, etc
-we support ours as a product while I believe theirs is more a community thing

bottomline- this is a product for us and our main business focus so you know we will be supporting it. There are other VM images of trac like this one -> http://www.vmware.com/vmtn/appliances/directory/308
BuildX is one of the better built ones, but the bottomline is it’s not a JumpBox. We also have 9 applications now that use the consistent JumpBox interface so if you’ve installed one, you know how to work with any of the others.

the “any OS” aspect is by virtue of the fact that it runs under virtualization so theirs shares that same quality. But yes, we believe our usability is superior.
sean

]]> By: Big Mad Kev http://www.scrollinondubs.com/2007/06/05/trac-subversion-jumpbox-released/comment-page-1/#comment-55365 Big Mad Kev Wed, 06 Jun 2007 07:44:20 +0000 http://67.106.82.230/2007/06/05/trac-subversion-jumpbox-released/#comment-55365 How does this differ from http://buildix.thoughtworks.com/? I guess it just easier to us and any OS? How does this differ from http://buildix.thoughtworks.com/? I guess it just easier to us and any OS?

]]>