May 24

In every good sense of the word that is: he’s quit all the right things. I had the opportunity to see him speak in front of a group of about 300 this morning at the Tempe Improv in Arizona. His talk was themed around his latest book the dip and dealt with the subject of when it makes sense to quit. My friend Francine wrote up a great summary of the content of his talk this morning and Guy Kawasaki covered the book well in his interview with Seth. So rather than rehash either of those, in “purple cow” style, I’m going to cover what I believe was remarkable about both.

I finished reading the dip just now. At 75pgs and big print it took less time read it than to hear the talk he gave this morning. His talk was essentially a multimedia version of the book with a focus on anecdotes that make the message more memorable. Seth is a marketing wizard and everything he does draws upon the basic marketing pillars he espouses in Purple Cow. The $50 price tag for this morning’s talk was actually positioned as a mandatory 5-book buy and a free pep talk, which is genius because he knows people will give away the books and “sneeze” his message to others. The books themselves contain a “guest book” registry at the back and encourage the reader to pass it along once finished.

Screw the long tail

Seth takes the heretical position that we don’t quit enough. That’s right. We stick it out too often in a mediocre situation content with average performance in an average arena rather than achieving “rockstar status” in a smaller, more-differentiated arena. His argument is that in a society where we are flooded with choices and different options along with the ability to quickly research and connect with the winner, why would anyone choose 2nd (let alone 15th) place? While the “long tail” produces huge profits for companies like Amazon and Netflix across many selections, individuals represents only one of those selections and therefore should strive to be the juicy #1 in a long-tail-type situation. The relationship between #1, #2, #3, etc is non-linear because the “winners win big because markets love a winner” effect.

Everything you learned in school is wrong

This was a powerful and jarring statement but he is right: the academic system (in America at least) encourages the wrong thing: mediocrity. Which report card do parents and teachers reward more, the kid with an A-, B+, B+, B, B or the kid with an A+ and all C’s? And yet how as a consumer do you choose your physician or auto mechanic or decorator- do you care what grades they got in the other classes? I asked him the question “assuming that you can’t effect policy changes in the broken school system, what can a teacher do now to improve things and impress the dip thinking on kids?” He responded with a personal story about seeing a 6th grader sing “somewhere over the rainbow” for the first time in front of an audience of 400 parents and how that one experience galvanized that child to become a different individual growing up from that point, to seek out that “rockstar” level of heightened experience in everything she did thereafter.

Be the best in the world

The critical thing is how you define “the world.” He advocates being the best in your customers’ world. Depending on what you’re doing, the parameters of that world may mean “the best organic supermarket in a five block radius of Manhattan.” Whatever that world is, identify a territory that is tenable and worth occupying and then dominate it. The second half of his book is titled “If you’re not going to get to #1, you might as well quit now.” This is a message you would never hear in school or from your parents but given the premise of the new economy, I believe he’s right. Obviously this doesn’t apply to hobbies and leisure activities- it’s only for the areas that involve pain and sacrifice for the pursuit of a goal.

Applicability to JumpBox

So I’m always looking through the lens of how this applies to our own startup and the things that resonate:

  • The fear of competition of other companies besting us in our space is a healthy thing as it keeps us sharp and slamming forward, but the fear of being stamped out by a goliath like a Microsoft is irrational- their world is by necessity not ours right now and it’s all in how you define “the world.” Our strategy to cordon off a very small world initially of IT admins having pain with Open Source is validated. Conquer that world first and then move up the food chain.
  • His point that “selling is about a transference of emotion, not a presentation of facts” is spot on. It’s the whole “sell the sizzle not the steak” idea. We are sometimes guilty of promoting all the logical reasons why one would choose to run their applications as virtual appliances but the reality is that until you appeal to that deep visceral gut emotion, all the figures and advantages are shallow “head-reaching” facts as opposed to “heart-reaching” feelings. This thinking has inspired me to make two critical initiatives for our online stuff which will become apparent shortly.
  • “The only reason the Space Shuttle still exists is because no one has the guts to cancel it.” So true. Why the hell are we still sending the Shuttle up in the sky? There has got to be a better use of that energy and those people- are people afraid that we won’t be able to come up with something as cool as the Shuttle program if we were to cancel it? No politician wants to be known as the person that nixed the great mission of space exploration, but that’s a lame reason for continuing to spend billions of dollars on it. This thinking has got me examining what I can and should quit that I’m doing now and how this could free up energy to focus on the dips worth tackling.
  • So to summarize: These seminars are great but it’s not what you learn or don’t learn but how it ultimately alters your behavior going forward. Dips are good because they screen the rest of the jokesters from being able to have rockstar status- scarcity creates value and the Dip is to be embraced. Failure is different than quitting. Quitting strategically when you’re in a cul-de-sac instead of a Dip is smart because it frees you up to pursue the avenues worth pursuing. I highly recommend you see Seth speak if you get the chance, he is an inspirational presenter. It was an honor to meet him and get a personalized “moo” shout out from the Purple Cow himself!
    sethGodinAndSean.jpg
    mooFromSeth.gif

    Mar 07

    Robert Scoble, author of the popular blog Scobleizer, was in town last week to keynote the Revolution in Marketing Conference. Chris Heuer from the Social Media Club also flew out from NYC to present. We captured all the audio sessions and made them available here in streaming format as well as downloadable MP3′s. Thanks to Francine Hardaway for organizing the conference all the sponsors and facilitators that made it possible.

    Dec 13

    We held the first ever Barcamp Phoenix event on Saturday at the UAT and drew a crowd of about 40 at it’s highest peak of attendance. It was an unstructured, participatory event in which we collected a bunch of potential tech topics, triaged them and then assigned a moderator. We chunked them into 15min quick sessions and flashed through them- any people wishing to delve deeper after the time limit were free to wander off and form a break-away session. All in all, a very positive event and proof that useful conferences don’t require massive preparation and strict schedules and agendas to be useful. Here’s the whiteboard of topics we came up with – the checked ones are the ones that we covered:

    BarcampPhxWhiteboard.jpg

    Chris Tingom posted a rundown on his blog, a couple others have posted flickr photos. and Erica Lucci posted extensive notes on the day. You can bet there will be another one of these events again. As far as what we learned about logistics in running things- it’s decentralized so there’s no set tracks or authoritative figure but at the same time, somebody needs to take charge and move things forward when a topic is exhausted. Doing 15min fly over sessions and allowing people to break off and dive deeper is a good approach- our group whittled down to about 25 so we all stayed in the big auditorium as one unit but factioning into smaller breakouts would be sensible at the next one when there’s a larger crowd.

    Keep your name on the wiki page if you intend to come to the next one. There was a company there that was capturing the video and projector demos by intercepting the VGA feed. They promise to post the sessions they captured once they’re produced and make them available via the Barcamp wiki. Thanks for everyone that attended. See you at the next one.

    Nov 17

    We just posted the audio from all the sessions at the first ever Arizona Entrepreneurship Conference last Wednesday. There’s a total of 800MB and 14hrs of information. It was mostly panels and interactive discussions facilitated by entrepreneurs and venture capitalists from Arizona who have first-hand experience of what works and what doesn’t in business. We released this audio via the Grid7 Venturecast podcast consistent with our goal of advancing entrepreneurship in AZ. In spite of a few technical glitches that diminished the quality it came out surprisingly decent given the situation. Big thanks to Francine Hardaway and her crew for making it happen.

    Oct 12

    office20Conference.gifThe conference here in San Francisco is winding down and I wanted to share a random collection of thoughts in no particular order.

    The Good

    As always it’s the hallway conversations at these events that are by far the most valuable bits. There were a good number of companies here (~20?) and I was able to meet the principles of just about all of them and talk with them about what challenges they have in delivering their products. There seems to be an energy in the air perhaps due to the YouTube acquisition earlier this week that indicates tech investments are once again where it’s at. So this is an exciting time to be in this field. There were a few demos that caught our interest for apps like SystemOne, Vyew and SmartSheets that look really interesting. And meeting the guys who built WordPress and Tech Dirt was very cool.

    The Not-so-good

    I hated the term “Web 2.0″ but I realize I hate the term “Office 2.0″ even more. If I’d have charged the conference sponsors a nickel for each mention of this term throughout the panels, I’d have recouped my entrance fee and have our second round of funding for JumpBox. Far too many of the demos given here showed off these me-too MS-copycat products ported to the web with a bunch of slick AJAX features. While this might have turned me on a couple years ago for the implementation details of how they pulled it off technically, it now feels like “features for features’ sake” and smells “bubblish” in this sort of silly exuberance over things that really aren’t that cool. To me the real productivity gains to be made in an office come from not having to think about software at all, getting rid of the lame problems that plague IT departments and, if done right, getting rid of the IT department itself. Gains will be made as we learn to unearth the underground insight of the organization that locked away in the form of unapplied knowledge. I’m way more excited about apps like InklingMarkets and the proposition of bringing the power of internal prediction markets to the office than I am about authoring a word doc within the browser. I just feel like most of the companies hawking their wares here are missing the boat.

    That being said, I don’t discount the value of better tools for collaboration. I just think that if I were running a larger company and had $10k to invest towards the goal of improving our productivity, I would spend zero on software apps and instead train all my employees on how to use David Allens GTD program, give them an incentive bonus for whoever comes up with the most innovative/effective improvement and then turn them all loose with an in-house instance of Trac/SVN to use in collaborating. The apps that did catch my eye here:

    • Vyew – a slick way to do a shared whiteboard synchronously as well as asynchronously
    • Koral – painless knowledge management
    • SystemOne – an intelligent self-building wiki
    • SmartSheets – a better method for excel/email-based project management
    • oDesk – be Big Brother for your outsourced development efforts

    Beyond those, the other apps I looked at really appeared to be just minor enhancements to existing ideas with little innovation. The new Tech Insight Commnity thing is interesting- essentially a way to disrupt expensive research from analysts like Forresters, Gartner’s and Cahner’s InStat by drawing upon cheap, qualified labor of bloggers around the world.

    Eighty percent of the demos were sub-par unfortunately. I’m thinking there really might be a market for pitching yourself as a hired gun who can effectively demo a company’s product and grab the audience, because apparently most CEO’s are inherently bad at it. Most of the speakers were so immersed in the features of their own product, they dove into this highly-technical tutorial of the guts of how their products work rather than establishing that emotional connection with the audience members for why they should even be listening in the first place. That coupled with some connectivity issues due to sharing wireless with the conference attendees and a rare server outage for google mail (which everyone seemed to be using as the example email service) made some of the demos really painful.

    To summarize though- some great people in attendance, a bit of a confused message (please please please let’s drop the 2.0 suffix on terms), good energy and vibe in general. Let’s just remember that the best technology are the ones we never notice (the refrigerators, the air conditioners, the airbags, the backup generators). Office 2.0 should be about simplifying not complicating the role of tech in the workplace.

    Jul 01

    Well CFUNITED is over and all I can say is “wow.” Having helped staff large conferences in the past I can vouch that it is a colossal undertaking to coordinate every detail of an event like this and Michael Smith and his crew did a superb job. The content was outstanding and the execution was flawless. I’m back at my buddy’s house in Arlington, VA with a backpack full of schwag, a wallet full of business cards and a head full of some very actionable ideas I plan to implement. The best way I think I can condense what I learned and summarize it is to do it in a 3-part series of posts over the next few days (i’m staying here so I can do DC on July 4th – i imagine that has to be the epicenter of the fiesta for this holiday). So I’ll do a braindump here on my take on the general aspects of the conference and save a summary of what I took from the sessions and hallway discussions for tomorrow.

    What worked well

    1. Registration – went off without a hitch and that’s tough to do.
    2. Schedule / room allocation / logistics- great job juggling disparate topics and using the concept of “tracks” to keep attractive options for different folks at every session time. In talking w/ Michael afterwards, I learned that Teratech used online pre-surveys to determine what sessions attendees wanted in order to decide which topic would get the larger room on each time slot- genius. The breakdown/setup of the rooms itself was quite a feat to watch- the hotel staff would move these enormous partitions around and create individual rooms or collapse them to form one ginormous room for the keynotes.
    3. Speeches – the content and delivery of the presentations was top notch. I was a Joel Spolsky fan before the show having listened to his talk on ITconversations.com and followed his blog for months so it was a treat to see him from the first row doing his thing live. There was not one presentation that I regretted attending and I went to all but two of the sessions.
    4. BoF – the “Birds of a Feather” informal discussions at night worked really well. Sitting in the back of the room at the Model-Glue/Fusebox/Mach-ii discussion, I have to admit I felt a bit like being back at the 2001 World Series watching this historical interaction of all the great players in one room. To be sitting there in front of the Macromedia dev team and witness the direct honest communication with the community they serve was an honor. I swear, the mental firepower in that room…if I ever have the ducats to afford a crazy mansion, I’ll just hire that room of people instead and make amazing things. What a fun team that would be to be a part of.
    5. Ubiquitious WiFi – the conference hall area had an open connection and at least 30% of the attendees could be seen at any given time huddled near an electrical outlet checking email, posting and reading blogs. It also meant you could load the CD of presentations on your laptop and follow along while the presenter was talking or even be researching the sites and concepts while they spoke. At one point I was talking with a lady and she pointed out something which is very true: “at these conferences wifi has come to be as expected an ammenity as drinking water” and it was true. The connection had problems the first day with either oversaturation or due to the login, but the Marriot promptly opened up another connection and al was well. I did consider busting out Whoppix to see exactly how many cleartext passwords were flying around the airwaves, but i decided against it
    6. Paperback schedule guide – the thick paperback index of all speakers, topics and presentations that was distributed at registration was sheer genius. When I first got it I thought “what a waste, why wouldn’t they just leave this on CD?” But having a physical paper guide which you could flip through between sessions to review the slides of the potential presenters was just a great decision making tool. There was a few toss-ups where I wish I could have attended two sessions occurring simultaneously but the speakers were very approachable and most understood and offered to send any extra materials upon request. I think every speaker I saw left his/her email on the powerpoint for attendees to contact them if they had questions.
    7. Good feedback mechanisms – the hotel staff were meticulous in distributing and collecting surveys after each presenter and Liz summarized the results of the surveys on stage in the wrap-up session reading back comments that testified to the quality of the speakers. This kind of feedback capture (and redistribution) is critical in order to know how to adjust for future shows and reinforce the speakers with praise. I did not realize that speakers were NOT paid for their talks- like college ball “every was there for the love of the game.” Really a good vibe.
    8. Accessibility – I had a one-hour commute everyday on the metro to Arlington which meant I actually had to use an alarm clock for the first time in about a year. Whether intentional or not, it was great that they chose a hotel with a metro stop just a block away.

    What was lacking (and this is a much shorter list)

    1. Depth and detail on many talks – I realize it’s difficult to present topics to an audience of varying skill levels and try to roll day’s worth of material into 50min but I found a lot of the presentations to be good overviews but lacking in depth and useable “next steps” type suggestions. On more than one occasion I found the preso getting really interesting about the time the hall monitor would step in and signal the wrapup.
    2. AZCFUG Model-Glue breezo – It’s a shame but Joe Rinehart’s breeze preso on Model-Glue just didn’t do justice to his talk the day before or even the actual live event itself. In Joe’s defense, it’s VERY difficult to juggle both a live audience and a remote one. The faces in front of you tend to take precedence. As far as the lack of planning- I think Joe had quite a bit on his plate having done an all-day class the day before (which was excellent). I checked out the breezo and quality is crappy but sh*t happens- just download the framework and tinker. I’m sure he’ll do another one soon.
    3. Conference fatigue – I don’t know how you solve this one because the alternative means you don’t cram as much valuable stuff in, but I was pretty fried by 5pm on the second day and ended up leaving a little early. You’re just barraged with so much dense valuable info and surrounded by droves of people, combined w/ the lack of sleep, it grinds you down by the end of the day. To their credit, they did have a maseuse in the hallway giving massages. I think the solution is to avoid extended stays w/ fellow developers at the bar late night…<!– READ: not really, just drink 2 redbulls after lunch –>

    Suggestions for improving things

    1. Archive the follow-up discussions- by far the most “meaty” part of the talks was the 5min after the presenter had finished and the room was clearing out when a small swarm of the people that had lightbulbs going off were asking questions. This fertile discussion should be archived whether via iPod or video. I caught a fantastic 20min discussion on my iTalk out on the hotel patio afterwards amongst some really bright guys. I’ll try and get it posted here soon.
    2. Conference “Yearbook” – at my University freshman year, when we arrived on the first day, we were given essentially a pre-yearbook with pictures of our freshman class that everyone had submitted. I thought it was great because you are blitzed with all these familiar names and a lot of times your putting a face to that name for the first time. I will never forget a face but I’m terrible with remembering everyone’s name. It would be great to have a way to leaf through a document that matched the face from the conference w/ that familiar name. When I did Proscout events, we had a webacm at registration and snapped a photo and quickly named it with the participant’s ID number on their badge. It worked well and similar thing could be done here for those that wished to participate. Taking it a step further, they could integrate it into Jared’s login for his “interest matching app” and make it so you could view this online, fix your picture if you didn’t like it and even expose a webservice to display a tiny face thumbnail when people comment on blogs. Don’t underestimate the value of faces in this industry
    3. Visual Likert Scale on Feeedback forms – I screwed up on the first day and gave a bunch of 1′s and 2′s on my ratings of speakers cause (stupidly) I didn’t read the directions and thought “1″ was the best rating to give. The guys at 37signals would say do something simple- a scale that looks like this:
      :-( 1 2 3 4 5 :-)
      I talked with a guy who had made the same mistake and corrected me after seeing me circle all one’s on Simon Horwith’s preso. As simple as it is, a visual likert scale would have cleared up that confusion easily.
    4. Easier way to lookup slides in paperback book by timeslot – this is a small detail but it would have been nice to have either the page number of the slides right on each timeslot in the schedule or some crossreference to make looking this up a little easier.

    I’ll do a summary of all my takeaways I gleaned tomorrow. I took six pages of notes and have a lot of things I want to tinker with. Kudos Teratech and all speakers on an excellent event. Being an independent consultant, I have to pay my own way to these things but I felt I got more than my money’s worth at this event. cheers

    preload preload preload