Home > Productivity > Urgency vs. Importance and the 5th system for scattered todos

Urgency vs. Importance and the 5th system for scattered todos

March 14th, 2007

I wrote a little while ago about this concept of “if you’ve highlighted everything…” and why it’s good to keep your main list of current assaults lean. I wanted to explain the concept of urgency vs. importance that I mentioned in that post and then propose a simple addition to the 4 mechanisms for managing scattered todo’s that I use.

Urgency and importance are completely independent of one another. Once you understand that, doing triage on a todo list becomes way easier. The best way to understand this concept is through a simple graph of tasks:

UrgencyVImportance.gif

I’ve found once you are able to visualize your todo list in this 2-d fashion it helps in a couple respects:

  1. You’re able to tease apart those items which truly have the ability to advance your cause from the ones that are just stressing you out because they’re yelling for your immediate attention. It’s an important distinction and critical to being effective.
  2. If you keep your items stored visually in this fashion it lets you quickly handle items in the right quadrant depending on the situation. You should obviously try to work on the right-most items as much as possible while giving attention to the upper right quadrant first. During the day, forget that the left quadrants even exist. When you’re decompressing, go to the lower-left. When you’re catching up on errands, upper-left. The point is you always know what you should be doing.
  3. This leads to what David Allen calls the “mind like water” feeling of being at peace even in the face of massive amounts of todo items. Even when there’s a kajillion things going on, there’s something about having an accurate picture of the field and knowing that your items are stored in a trusted system and you’re knocking out the priorities first.

Where I disagree with the orthodox GTD cultish philosophy that Allen espouses is in the idea that you should try to cram everything into a single trusted system. I wrote about the 4 mechanisms I used to do what I call “Scattered Todo Management” and having tried orthodox GTD, I found this to be more suited to the way I work. Anytime you find yourself uncomfortable contorting your processes to match the latest and greatest productivity religion, I think that’s bad. Ultimately you should learn the fundamentals of various different productivity religions and pick and choose the elements that work for you and make your own.

So this is the 5th System for Scattered Todo Management that I’ve been using and want to share. It’s a simple way of easily deferring and categorizing tasks while still making immediate steps toward the solution and preventing build-up of crap in your inbox:

  1. Mentally superimpose the above graph on your desktop (or if you really want, draw it as your background).
  2. Drag the resources (URL locations, documents, graphics, audio files, forms, whatever you’re working with) to the appropriate quadrants on your desktop. URLs are the exact pages on a site with which you need to do whatever task it is. You can chunk a bunch of related items for a discreet task in a folder.
  3. Now rename the filenames to “verb-noun” (ie. “handle tax returns” URL item links to the online filing page on the IRS.gov site)

That’s the essence of it and simple as it seems, it’s a way to have a big picture view of the tasks on your plate and to defer the low-priority items while still “teeing them up” so you don’t have to weed through a daunting inbox of emails to figure out what each task involves. This is my desktop right now:


visualDesktopTriage.gif



As you can see items are roughly thrown into the spots that correlate with the position on the urgency vs. priority graph above. I’ve found this technique helpful along with the other 4 systems to manage the things I’m doing every day. If you have a homegrown productivity technique that works well for you, I would love to hear about it.

Productivity

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. March 18th, 2007 at 21:08 | #1

    This is a principle I learned from playing Go, a game in which you are usually faced with a great number of possible moves. So, prioritize big (i.e. important) moves and urgent moves.

    Julian

  2. April 6th, 2007 at 19:32 | #2

    Great post, Sean — I’m also a very visual person, and this sounds like a great system.

    I’ve customized my own way of working, too, having rejected “orthodox GTD”… and this is a great tweak to add into my plan.

    I’m not a big fan of cluttering up my desktop, though… I take the Zen approach to my desktop. Instead, I have a page in a Curio document that has my current projects in it, which is easy to pull up. (Whatever works, eh?)

    Anyhow, thanks again — great insight.

  3. August 24th, 2007 at 12:32 | #3

    This is a great concept, but I would make one suggestion. Reverse the horizonatal arrow to point left. Although we tend to think of right as better than left, you end with your MOST important items in the top right section. Studies have proven, however, that English readers have been trained to begin, and so focus more intently on the top LEFT section of a media.

    If you are using the visual version of the graph as an actual to-do list, as I am wont to do, having your most important items in the location your eye is naturally drawn to will increase your chance of getting to those items first.

  4. September 14th, 2007 at 12:40 | #4

    Original idea! Seems like a lot of work, though…

  5. October 1st, 2009 at 21:11 | #5

    Original idea! Seems like a lot of work, though…

  6. Huiyu
    February 1st, 2010 at 23:08 | #6

    Greate idea!

    But can you help me about how to judge what is Urgency and what is Important?

    I think things help me with my target is more important, but can the urgency be judged based on time limit ? Or anything else?

    Thanks very much

  1. March 15th, 2007 at 14:50 | #1
  2. March 17th, 2007 at 16:52 | #2
  3. April 12th, 2007 at 09:26 | #3
  4. August 24th, 2007 at 04:31 | #4
  5. August 24th, 2007 at 12:55 | #5
  6. August 24th, 2007 at 13:10 | #6
  7. August 28th, 2007 at 09:46 | #7
  8. September 6th, 2007 at 07:01 | #8
  9. April 21st, 2008 at 09:57 | #9